" " indicates required fields
AI has significantly expanded red teaming capabilities, introducing new attack surfaces for models and the products and systems they power. It’s even reached the White House.
Executive Order (EO 14110), issued in October 2023, introduced a federal framework for AI’s safe and secure development, including mandates for red teaming to uncover safety, bias, and misuse risks. Red teaming is no longer a niche practice – it’s now a strategic requirement across AI development lifecycles.
Microsoft’s AI Red Team (AIRT) conducted security evaluations on over 100 GenAI systems, identifying vulnerabilities with implications far beyond tech. These insights are especially critical for regulated, connected sectors like healthcare, automotive, and critical infrastructure, where model behavior can affect safety, compliance, and reputation.
Are the GenAI systems integrated into your workflows, introducing silent risks?
This article highlights three essential takeaways from Microsoft’s research that product security leaders can use to strengthen their AI red teaming strategies, particularly in domains where safety, regulation, and trust intersect.
AI tools and systems are susceptible to prompt injection, jailbreaking, and data poisoning attacks. A separate study found that 20% of GenAI jailbreak attempts were successful. Researchers also noted that it took attackers an average of 42 seconds and 5 interactions to succeed.

*Image taken from the MSFT report
In a connected healthcare ecosystem, attackers can leverage a Vision-Language Model (VLM) to jailbreak and compromise medical devices by altering diagnostic outputs or modifying patient records. This image-to-text prompt attack poses serious risks to patient safety while exposing sensitive PII and violating data privacy laws.
Other sectors, such as the automotive or industrial, may face heightened supply chain security risks with a software update containing malicious dependencies that a pre-trained AI model might have mistaken for a legitimate package from a trusted source. An independent study analyzing 576,000 code samples generated by 16 large language models (LLMs) found that nearly 20% of package dependencies referenced by these models did not exist. The study also concluded that open-source models produced ~22% more hallucinated dependencies than commercial alternatives.
Package hallucinations can escalate into breaches without proper validation or AI security guardrails. This risk is directly tied to red teaming exercises, which simulate real-world attacks mapped to adversarial tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) to identify how automated development workflows might unintentionally introduce malicious dependencies into the software supply chain.
Here are several key takeaways and lessons uncovered by Microsoft’s AI Red Team (AIRT):
Other best practices product security teams can implement with AI red teaming include:
AI red teaming reveals real risks – but what happens next?
Teams need a platform that connects red team outcomes to risk scoring, design controls, and product release decisions to turn findings into secure, compliant, and shippable products.
C2A Security’s EVSec platform provides that layer of intelligence.
EVSec enables product security teams to:
AI red teaming isn’t just a model-hardening practice – it’s a strategic imperative for regulated, connected industries. But red team insights are only valuable if they’re operationalized.
C2A Security’s EVSec platform ensures your red teaming outcomes don’t stay trapped in spreadsheets or static reports – but become actionable, measurable inputs into your product security and compliance programs.
Schedule a demo to learn how C2A Security can help complement your AI red teaming strategy.
Dynamic threat modeling and risk assessment aligned with global regulations
LLM-agnostic generative AI layer powering automation across every module
Aggregated threat feed contextualized against your actual products
Generate, manage, and triage all BOMs and vulnerabilities across the lifecycle
Quantitative optimization of mitigation strategy and security control allocation
Configurable dashboards and reports across every EVSec data layer
Extract software composition and risk from firmware and binaries without source code
Optimized anomaly detection for Ethernet and CAN, plus ECU runtime protection
Quantify and manage cybersecurity risk for products operating in the field
Enrich SOC events with deep product and architecture context
Context-driven test and validation with intelligent fuzzing, integrated into CI/CD
AI-powered static analysis integrated into CI/CD with reduced false positives
Foundational layer: cyber model, workspaces, and integration backbone to DevOps toolchain
Out-of-the-box and customizable workflows for regulatory and security processes
Centralized compliance management with evidence generated from live data